• BigCanoe.com Isn’t Ours. But We Paid nearly $500,000 to Mr. Rhodes and his private firm, Big Canoe Brokerage. Why? -and why would anyone from our community now chose to buy or sell a home with this firm?

    The POA paid $500,000 to Big Canoe Realty—a private firm owned by a non-resident—to “buy back” partial rights to our community’s name.

    But here’s the kicker: we still don’t own BigCanoe.com.

    Google us, visit our domain name, BigCanoe.com and you’ll see a version of Big Canoe shaped and controlled by someone not living in our community, but Mr. Rhodes and his team of agents are profiting from home listings in our community.

    Here’s another kicker: We didn’t have to pay Big Canoe Brokerage anything. So why did we?

    Big Canoe is a location—and locations can’t be trademarked.

    Respected trademark attorneys say we could’ve challenged the claim and easily won—and for far less than $500,000. So why didn’t we?

    Sadly, most property owners never even knew this was happening—because concerns like these are routinely silenced in official channels. Neighbor to Neighbor, the POA Board’s managed Facebook group, deletes posts and blocks real questions.

    Property owners were not consulted. We never knew we lost our name -then quickly told, then told we are rebranding, then wait, we’re spending nearly half a million dollars to buy . . .what?

    We still don’t know. But we do know we don’t own BigCanoe.com even after a $500,000 payment. Why?

    As for Mr. Rhodes and Big Canoe Brokerage, who charged us property owners $500,000 to buy back partial rights to our name (we still don’t control our web address), -you might want to think twice before doing business with BCB.

    It’s time to demand transparency—and stop settling for silence, and to vote with your dollars.

    With Respect, A Growing Group of Concerned Property Owners & Residents

    👉 Join the Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum

  • We Get Fined. Our GM, Scott Auer, Gets a Pass.

    ARC enforcement in Big Canoe has doubled in size—now citing residents for minor issues and focusing on the letter of the rules, rather than their intent.

    Meanwhile, many POA-managed properties visibly fall short of those same standards. Peeling paint, neglected maintenance, reflective-structures, mismatched repairs—it’s all there, yet no consequences follow.

    Residents are being watched closely—sometimes with binoculars—for things as simple as bird feeders, while POA properties remain unchecked. The double standard is hard to ignore.

    Let’s be honest: if you stare at any home long enough, you’ll find a violation. But after the obvious ones are addressed, what’s left? When does enforcement shift from community protection to community harassment?

    Is ARC still serving its original purpose—or has it become a tool for revenue and control? Is it helping make up for the Food Truck and Clubhouse losses due to gross mismanagement?

    Try asking that on Neighbor to Neighbor. If your N2N post questions the POA, it’ll be rejected or removed. On our property owner’s and residents forum group it’ll will go uncensored.

    It’s time for the censorship to stop. Big Canoe needs open and honest dialogue, and transparency from our elected POA Board.

    With Respect, A Growing Group of Concerned Property Owners & Residents

    👉 Join the Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum

  • When serious questions arise—about finances, infrastructure, or the $500,000 paid to Mr. Rhodes and “Big Canoe Realty” for a name we still don’t own—the POA remains silent.

    But let a little wind or rain blow in, and suddenly our inboxes fill with weather alerts and dramatic warnings to stay home. Most residents already have numerous weather apps. What we don’t have is clear communication from our POA Board about the issues that actually shape our community.

    Even more frustrating? Our General Manager is rarely seen when it counts. In the past year, public Q&A has been nearly nonexistent—just a handful of streamed videos but dozens of weather emails.

    Big Canoe is a $100 million+ community. It deserves qualified leadership—someone equipped to manage an asset of this scale. Right now, we’re from that with a former Molly Maid franchise operator at the helm –and a poor one at that.

    Weather alerts everywhere, but it’s common for a property owner to show up at the Lakeside Food Truck only to find it closed again—no notice, no explanation. Just more silence and poor communication.

    The GM’s job is to inform residents—not about the weather -we have tons of sources for weather. We need information and transparency about the major issues affecting our property owners and our community.

    We deserve facts. We deserve transparency. Not distractions Mr. Auer.

    Let’s raise the standard for communication—and stop the barrage of weather alerts.

    With Respect, A Growing Group of Concerned Property Owners & Residents

    👉 Join the Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum

  • Another chef is gone—again. Owners get a polished goodbye, but no explanation for losing another key team member. Chef Hector worked hard, stepped up after so many others abruptly walked-out under our GM, and now he’s suddenly out with yet, another “generous package.”

    $30,000 plus we’re told for this NDA exit. Down from $80,000 for the last one. Why? What happened -again? Why does this keep happening?

    Why the large exit packages for so many F&B staff under GM Scott Auer?

    Too many departing key managers receive large payouts in exchange for signed NDAs not to disclose or sue us. The reasons and costs are never disclosed—and our questions are ignored -and our costs keep rising due to what? Poor management?

    Turnover on the F&B team isn’t just high—it’s unsustainable and costly to property owners.

    How many chefs and managers have we lost in three years? How many got buyouts? What’s the real cost in lost food service and property owner dollars? Can we have a board member please answer these questions?

    Our GM’s pattern is clear:

    • No transparency.
    • Spin, not answers.
    • No accountability.

    Buzzwords like “vision” and phrases like “it’s gonna be SO great” from our GM are NOT enough. Residents deserve real management, not just the appearance of it. We need an elected POA Board that can stop with the spin support.

    This isn’t just an F&B issue. It’s a management issue. Until we demand answers from our elected POA Board members, management won’t change, and our Big Canoe costs will go up and our Big Canoe experience will decline.

    It’s time for our elected Board to hold our GM accountable. Big Canoe needs accountability from the top.

    With Respect, A Growing Group of Concerned Property Owners & Residents

    👉 Join the Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum

  • Facebook can be a difficult place for civil discussion—especially when it concerns our own Big Canoe community.

    Posting anonymously is a personal choice—and often necessary to avoid backlash or harassment. Yet, instead of engaging with ideas, some respond with personal attacks, questioning identity or motives rather than addressing concerns.

    This silences voices, intimidates residents, and fosters fear. Many who might otherwise speak up now stay silent, fearing hostility.

    If this is our environment, we should ask why hostility arises—not why someone chooses anonymity. As Audre Lorde said, “Your silence will not protect you.” But silence should never be imposed by those unwilling to welcome open, respectful dialogue.

    Big Canoe deserves better—a community where everyone feels safe to share ideas and ask tough questions, whether under their real name or anonymously.

    Anonymity is not unusual here: public safety complaints, ARC violations, and property visits often start from anonymous tips. Our governance protects these mechanisms.

    So why is it suddenly unacceptable when a concerned resident asks thoughtful questions anonymously?

    We’re not here to play “gotcha.” We’re here to discuss real concerns—property values, gain accountability from our elected POA board, and make our future brighter.

    This Facebook group was created by a growing group of concerned property owners to be an uncensored place for positive change –unlike the POA run N2N Facebook group and the POA owned Smoke Signals.

    Everyone deserves a voice—especially if anonymity is the only way to avoid harassment at the Wellness Center, the Package Porch, The Food Truck, or even at Lowe’s.

    If someone asks real, thoughtful questions about Big Canoe’s future, let’s respond to those ideas—not attack the person behind them.

    We don’t have to agree on everything, but we must respect one another if we want this community to thrive.

    Let’s focus on the issues and solutions—not identities. That’s how real dialogue begins.

    With Respect, A Growing Group of Concerned Property Owners & Residents

    👉 Join the Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum

  • It’s true. Everywhere. Your phone, email, physical addresses, even your relatives . . . and more.

    Your personal data is legally, and easily, acquired through national data brokerscompanies that compile and sell information drawn from public records, online activity, purchases, and more.

    If you’ve ever received a phone call, a political flyer, real estate postcard, or credit card offer, you already know how this works. Anyone with a budget can purchase your data.

    How Do They Get My Info?

    Data brokers gather and blend details from a surprising number of sources, including:

    • Property records
    • Voter registrations
    • Online purchases
    • Social media profiles
    • App activity and location data
    • Search and browsing history
    • Mobile phone tracking

    Do you know your phone constantly pings your location? Many apps track you and sell that data to firms that map where you go, how long you stay, and how often you return. Retailers, marketers, sports teams, venues, and even political groups use this information to profile households and send targeted messages.

    It’s legal—and it’s everywhere.

    Want to See What’s Out There?

    Google yourself. You’ll likely find your home value, estimated income, political leanings, family members—even hobbies.

    The Point Is…

    You weren’t “targeted.”
    You weren’t “sold out by the POA.” (They did nothing wrong here to our knowledge)
    You were identified using tools that have quietly shaped modern marketing and political outreach for decades.

    Most brokers offer an “opt-out” option—but it’s tedious, and sometimes triggers even more data indexing in the process.

    Your data was acquired and we simply want you, Big Canoe residents, to be informed. If we interrupted you, we apologize. All we want is to encourage community awareness, discussion, and participation.

    We started our group because Big Canoe deserves open, honest, and uncensored conversation. We don’t need to agree on everything—but we do need a space where respectful dialogue is possible, even when views differ.

    Civility might be rare online, but it doesn’t have to be in Big Canoe.

    Let’s raise the level of dialogue—and the expectations we have for our community. Together.

    With Respect, A Growing Group of Concerned Property Owners & Residents

    👉 Join the Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum

  • Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum was created to give property owners and residents a place to ask real questions, speak freely, and share concerns—without the censorship of the POA run Facebook Group, N2N. Or the POA owned publication, Smoke Signals, or the limitations and restrictions of the POA “streamed” meetings with little to no Q&A.

    But let’s be clear: free speech doesn’t mean free-for-all and being a meanie.

    We’re here because we are property owners who care deeply about Big Canoe and want it to be the best version of itself—for each of us.

    That means welcoming different viewpoints, encouraging POA transparency, and holding our elected POA board accountable—without turning every post into an argument or an attack on an individual because you disagree with their view.

    Different opinions aren’t threats—they’re opportunities to listen, consider, and grow. You’re welcome to challenge ideas, offer perspective, or disagree—but please be polite.


    This Group is About:

    • Uncensored posts
    • Open conversation
    • Different perspectives—shared respectfully
    • Polite disagreement without personal attacks
    • A community that listens and improves—even when we don’t all agree

    Civility is rare online—but it’s worth aiming for. We’re not always going to agree. That’s okay. How we handle disagreement says everything about who we are as neighbors.


    This Group is Not About:

    • Tearing people down
    • Name-calling or personal attacks
    • Endless bickering
    • Blind loyalty to any side
    • Censorship of valid concerns

    That’s not productive—and it’s not what our Big Canoe property owner & resident Facebook group is for.

    We’re neighbors first—and we believe respect should come with the territory.

    We want Big Canoe to thrive—and that starts with better conversation. If you feel the same, you’re in the right place.

    Let’s set a new tone for Big Canoe—one that listens, respects, and includes.


    With Respect, A Growing Group of Concerned Property Owners & Residents

    👉 Join the Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum

  • Your voice matters—but right now, it’s being censored, deleted, or rejected entirely.

    👉 Join the Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum

    ——A space for real questions and open & honest dialogue. No filters. No censorship. Just the truth. Property Owner–Led coverage for Big Canoe.


    What Sparked This?

    Here’s what triggered it—and why so many residents are upset and wanting a place to speak, connect and communicate.

    On January 25th, residents learned—via a one-way video stream—that Big Canoe doesn’t own its name, logo, or domain name (BigCanoe.com). Naturally, questions followed:

    Why don’t we own it? When did we lose it? How long has The Board and management known? And why wasn’t it disclosed sooner?

    Unfortunately residents were NOT given the opportunity to ask those questions publicly—and no one in management offered answers. Then, just four weeks later on February 27th, -and again via a one-way monologue stream, the POA Board and General Manager announced a rushed “unbranding” effort to begin in four days. . . .Monday morning Big Canoe signage will be coming down. Wait, what?

    No Q&A. No open discussion. No transparency.

    Major decisions. Zero public discussion.

    Two days later on a Saturday, Property Owners quickly assembled in a field and began to ask questions and push back . . . and with our GM missing, and only one board member addressing the property owners in a field, the POA paused -and for a moment, it felt like we were being heard. The board member publicly said they’d explore options to keep our name and try and work something out with Big Canoe Realty.

    But instead of defending our trademark rights to our name—and challenging a weak trademark claim as attorneys advised—the POA quietly agreed to pay a gross sum of $500,000 to Big Canoe Realty, a private firm owned by Mr. Rhodes, a non-resident whose realty company and team of agents profit from our community.

    And what did the property owners buy for nearly half a million of our dollars? The GM hasn’t disclosed it, but we didn’t get full ownership of our name. We didn’t even get control.

    To this day, BigCanoe.com still belongs to Mr. Rhodes and Big Canoe Realty. This isn’t just a bad deal. It’s unacceptable.

    Every time someone visits BigCanoe.com, they see a version of our community shaped by a private real estate firm, Big Canoe Realty -a firm that just extorted money from us -the Property Owners and residents. (Go to BigCanoe.com now. We don’t own it.)

    And the real kicker is, we did NOT have to pay Big Canoe Realty $500,000. We could have easily challenged the rights to our name, and very likely won the rights to our name based on two BIG reasons:

    Number one is pretty HUGE, and number two is absolutely MASSIVE.

    That means the party who first used “Big Canoe” commercially—in this case, us / our community—holds superior rights, even if Big Canoe Realty is now trying to claim it through federal registration.

    According to respected trademark attorneys, Property Owners could have challenged the claim and very likely won—for far less than $500,000.

    More to gain, less to pay. Hmmm. . . . Why pay $500,000—just to let Big Canoe Realty control how Big Canoe is represented online? Why didn’t we fight back?

    The deal—and its terms—have been kept quiet. Why?

    Sadly, residents were never informed, consulted, or given a voice in the process. Now many are wondering: Why would our own POA management not fight to take legal ownership and full control of the name of the very community it serves? And why isn’t our Board holding management accountable?

    In the past, our GM has worked to deny Property Owners the opportunity to ask these questions in an open and public environment. And when residents ask these questions today, in POA monitored spaces like the Neighbor to Neighbor Facebook Group they’re quietly rejected or deleted.

    Fact is, honest, open dialogue that questions, doubts, or is simply critical of our Board and POA is not permissible on the Neighbor to Neighbor Facebook Group. “Can you say State Controlled Media”? A little China right here in Big Canoe ;-)

    Our POA Has Been Controlling the Messages -and Property Owners. Enough.

    We’re Taking Back the Mic.

    👉 Join the Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum

    A resident-led group where you can ask real questions, speak freely, and hold leadership accountable.


    What Else Is Going On?

    Below are nine more reasons property owners are have serious concerns—and are taking action.

    1. Lack of Communication and Transparency

    Board meetings have been closed for months and streamed with no opportunity for Q&A at some very important meetings and limited Q&A at other meetings. Even when meetings were held in person, residents were limited to one question—followed by tightly controlled discussion or no response at all.

    The POA claims to welcome questions through Ask the POA—but replies are delivered privately, one-on-one, and rarely shared publicly. If they’re willing to answer, why hide it?

    In 2025, when open forums, community threads, and searchable FAQs are standard, this communication model isn’t just outdated—it’s evasive.

    2. Censorship of Resident Voices

    The official Neighbor to Neighbor Facebook group is tightly moderated by individuals closely aligned with POA management. Until recently, it was run by an anonymous figure known only as “Monique Farmgirl”—a pseudonym never explained, despite her having the critical role of verifying addresses, and deciding who could join the group and speak. Stop and think about that for a moment.

    Posts critical of the POA are regularly denied or deleted. Discussion is steered to favor management.

    So little transparency—so much narrative control.

    3. Loss of Brand Control and $500,000 Payment to Big Canoe Realty

    Residents weren’t informed that Big Canoe didn’t own its name or domain until January 28. Only then did we learn that our POA planned a rebranding—and had agreed to a $500,000 payment to Big Canoe Realty, owned by Mr. Rhodes, to regain partial rights.

    Despite the large payout, control of BigCanoe.com remains in the hands of Big Canoe Realty, and the firm continues to shape the public image of our community by owning and controlling BigCanoe.com

    Big Canoe Realty held our name for ransom—and we paid.

    No open vote. No full explanation. No public review -HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE?

    4. Concerns About the Food Truck Project

    Residents have never received a full breakdown of the costs related to the Lakeside Bistro Food Truck buildout and operations—estimated between $2.3 and $2.7 million. No earnings reports. No transparency. No clarity on ROI.

    Meals are served on paper plates. Traffic is light. Staff were abruptly laid off, and unprofessionally discarded just before the holidays. And now, according to our GM Scott Auer, the recent chef, Hector, was given a “generous exit package?” Why? Another lead chef gone? How many chefs has our GM been through and at what cost to property owners?

    All while residents report underwhelming frozen-fried food at premium prices—and wine tastings are reportedly given away at property owner’s expense to boost attendance.

    If it’s working so well, why the constant, and considerable, F&B losses? Why the constant F&B turnover?

    Was/Is this food truck a good use of our funds?

    5. Concerns About Dam Repairs

    The timeline for critical dam repairs was extended multiple times, and no public cost breakdown has been shared. Few updates. No financial disclosures. No clear explanation of delays.

    This critical project affects key roads, infrastructure, and property values—yet there’s been little real resident engagement. What we receive instead has been a thin veneer of openness -masking the `unknown.

    6. Overreach by the Architectural Review Committee (ARC)

    ARC enforcement has doubled in size —now issuing rapid-fire fines for even minor violations such as bird-feeders, umbrella colors, and a long list of other nonsensical policing.

    Meanwhile, POA-managed properties routinely fall short of ARC standards: peeling paint, glaring metal roofs, neglected maintenance, unscreened equipment and mechanical units on buildings—with zero accountability.

    Safe to say, if you’re looking for a violation, and you stare at a home long enough, you’ll find a violation.

    But this is an established, well-kept community. How many real violations are left?

    When does enforcement become harassment? Is ARC a profit center subsidizing amenity losses due to poor financial management?

    7. Urgent Weather Alerts, Silent on Real Issues

    When it comes to real issues—finances, infrastructure, losing our brand—our POA management goes silent. But let a rainstorm roll in, and suddenly our inboxes are flooded with dramatic storm hype.

    Meanwhile, you want to grab a Wednesday bite at the Food Truck Bistro and show up to find the doors locked —yet again closed due to our ongoing and persistent labor troubles—all without a word of notice.

    We all have easy access to weather alerts from dozens of sources. What we don’t have is clear, consistent communication from our POA on important and relevant community issues.

    That’s POA management’s job—and they’re not doing it—and our Board isn’t holding our GM accountable. We all like people on our board, but we need them to do their job and hold our GM accountable.

    We deserve communication that informs, not distracts. It’s time for facts, accountability, and support—not fear-based messaging.

    Pro TIP: Ask a POA Board Member you know to hold management accountable.

    8. The Board’s Job Is Leadership—Not Deference

    Our Board is made up of neighbors and friends—people we know and appreciate—but the role comes with real responsibility: to ask hard questions, provide oversight, and hold management accountable.

    Our General Manager isn’t elected—he’s hired and managed by our POA Board. But in critical moments, our GM sets the agenda and drives decisions. That’s why we rely on the Board—to represent us, ask the hard questions we can’t, and ensure management is acting openly, honestly, and in the community’s best interest.

    In any well-run organization—whether a business, a nonprofit, or a homeowners’ association—boards are expected to supervise leadership, not simply support it. Like any good nonprofit board, our Board must ensure POA management acts with transparency, competence, and community trust.

    This isn’t about conflict or assigning blame. It’s about standards. More than ever, Big Canoe needs a POA Board that’s more than a likable neighbor—but capable of providing clear, effective oversight.

    We should expect our POA Board to lead with transparency, —and as property owners we need to verify -not just trust- that they are performing their duties.

    9. Leadership and Accountability Concerns

    Big Canoe is a $100 million+ asset. It should be run with the skill and discipline of a real business—not a backyard project.

    So why is Big Canoe being led by a General Manager with no prior or proven experience managing a community—or anything even close to this importance and scale?

    Scott Auer was absent during the rebranding fallout, refused to face live questions, and still avoids public accountability. Instead, he delivers mostly streamed (and largely scripted) videos praising his own performance—while hiding from and ignoring the property owner’s he’s paid to serve.

    Key concerns include:

    • Unqualified Leadership: No executive experience managing a community, or much else. (Pro TIP:Ask a Board Member to see a copy of our GM’s resume.)
    • Branding Chaos: $500K spent. Still no control of our name or online presence.
    • No Project Clarity: Budgets & timelines remain vague across major initiatives (Damn, Clubhouse)
    • Wasteful Capital Spending: High-cost, low-use food truck setup with no public ROI.
    • F&B Instability: Constant staff turnover and low morale in food service operations.

    This isn’t personal—it’s about performance. And the record speaks for itself.


    Let’s Fix It. Where We Go From Here.

    We’ve launched the Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum, Property Owner–Led coverage for Big Canoe.

    No filters. No censorship. Just the truth. Open & honest dialogue.

    Because we all care deeply about this place we call home. The first step is coming together—and deciding our path forward. If our Board won’t hold our management accountable, who will?

    Let’s take back our voice—before more damage is done.

    With Respect, A Growing Group of Concerned Property Owners & Residents

    👉 Join the Big Canoe Property Owners & Residents Forum